Page 58 of 65

Re: Zero-1 PBF

PostPosted: March 23rd, 2012, 3:10 pm
by AbsoluteZero
Rigel Invasion

Round 2

Mentak
1mu 2@6 : 1,1
2gf 2@8 : 3,8 - 1hit

Naalu
2gf 2@8 : 6,4

Round 3

Mentak
1mu 2@6 : 7,9 - 2hits
2gf 2@8 : 2,3

Naalu
1gf 1@8 : 4

Re: Zero-1 PBF

PostPosted: March 23rd, 2012, 3:48 pm
by Shifi
Naalu up.

Re: Zero-1 PBF

PostPosted: March 23rd, 2012, 4:40 pm
by Aweberman
Well, that could have gone better.

Activate Bureaucracy.
Place CC in Strategy.

Re: Zero-1 PBF

PostPosted: March 23rd, 2012, 7:25 pm
by Shifi
Mentak uses 2ndary (unless of course the PO is CC related!)

Re: Zero-1 PBF

PostPosted: March 25th, 2012, 5:48 pm
by jpsuchecki
i know its my turn, but i'm waiting for objectives to be revealed.

Re: Zero-1 PBF

PostPosted: March 26th, 2012, 6:06 am
by Not2good
Arborec will also use diplomacy secondary.

CC 1/5/6 TAP 3/7/5

Re: Zero-1 PBF

PostPosted: March 26th, 2012, 10:21 am
by Aweberman
New Public Objective: "I destroyed an opponent's Space Dock at the end of combat this [round]." (2VP)
Naalu claim Public Objective: "I have more than one Technology Advance in 3 different colors." (1VP)

Bureaucracy secondaries continue,
then N'orr is next.

Re: Zero-1 PBF

PostPosted: March 26th, 2012, 1:11 pm
by Shifi
Not2good wrote:Arborec will also use diplomacy secondary.

CC 1/5/6 TAP 3/7/5


You mean Bureau right?

Re: Zero-1 PBF

PostPosted: March 26th, 2012, 1:55 pm
by 2Kid
Nekro 2/6/2 2/5/3. Activate Bureau secondary. Gain 1 AC 1 PC 1 TG
1/6/2 3/6/4

Aweberman wrote:New Public Objective: "I destroyed an opponent's Space Dock at the end of combat this [round]." (2VP)

Thats annoying. After I conceded that dock to Arborec. Who also happens to hold my support for the throne.

Re: Zero-1 PBF

PostPosted: March 26th, 2012, 2:08 pm
by Shifi
Ugh, Support of the Throne. I've never offered it out, and have very rarely been offered it. I always wondered what drives people to need something so badly that they would give away a permanent VP.

Re: Zero-1 PBF

PostPosted: March 26th, 2012, 5:52 pm
by 2Kid
The PBF's I'm in were the first time I used Reps and PNC's. My ftf is just getting around to Assembly II. I can still imagine scenario's where Support is useful to give. However hindsight clearly shows that this one was a bad idea. I wonder though what did you need so badly to give me a permanent VP earlier . :p

Re: Zero-1 PBF

PostPosted: March 26th, 2012, 6:37 pm
by Aweberman
2Kid wrote:I wonder though what did you need so badly to give me a permanent VP earlier . :p

If you're referring to that PC from the last round ... well, I can only speak for myself, but I thought wiping out your Flagship was an important thing to accomplish. I had hopes that someone would swoop into your HS, but the other attacks you endured still had a net positive effect. In my eyes, anyway. :D

Re: Zero-1 PBF

PostPosted: March 26th, 2012, 6:39 pm
by Not2good
I disagree. That was an effective use of the PN.

Your current position of dominance is directly due to that deal.

And you intended me to destroy that dock. I would've rather captured it.

Re: Zero-1 PBF

PostPosted: March 26th, 2012, 7:26 pm
by AbsoluteZero
I think I'm up to date.

Mentak needs to discard 1 PC

N'orr's turn.

Re: Zero-1 PBF

PostPosted: March 26th, 2012, 7:46 pm
by jpsuchecki
activate garbozia

move in merc, DD, and carrier (picking up GF, 2 fighters and General, picking up second GF and 2 figthers in home system due to gravity drive)

shooting pds units.

playing no action cards during precombat or first round of combat

1/6/2 1/4/3