Page 1 of 1

Has the look of the Modules section changed?

PostPosted: July 31st, 2016, 4:39 am
by RobS
Well, yes, of course it has, otherwise I wouldn't be posting this.
So, I guess my real question is, is this permanent, a temporary trial or a glitch?

Re: Has the look of the Modules section changed?

PostPosted: July 31st, 2016, 2:38 pm
by DrNostromo
Joel just made some upgrades to the site and a few things have needed to be adjusted. I'm sure he'll get that worked out shortly.

Re: Has the look of the Modules section changed?

PostPosted: July 31st, 2016, 10:56 pm
by uckelman
Thus spake RobS:
> Well, yes, of course it has, otherwise I wouldn't be posting this.
> So, I guess my real question is, is this permanent, a temporary trial or
> a glitch?

I upgraded us from MediaWiki 1.25 to 1.26 yesterday and threre's an
incompatiblity with our theme. I'm working on fixing it.

--
J.

Re: Has the look of the Modules section changed?

PostPosted: August 1st, 2016, 7:23 am
by Dulgin
Hi Joel,

thank you for the info.


Yesterday I have tired to upload 2 module-files. I've got the error that the mime-type of the files isn't valied.
Please check it.

Re: Has the look of the Modules section changed?

PostPosted: August 1st, 2016, 12:50 pm
by uckelman
Thus spake Dulgin:
> Hi Joel,
>
> thank you for the info.
>
>
> Yesterday I have tired to upload 2 module-files. I've got the error that
> the mime-type of the files isn't valied.
> Please check it.

Try now. You should find this is fixed.

--
J.

Re: Has the look of the Modules section changed?

PostPosted: August 1st, 2016, 1:14 pm
by Dulgin
uckelman wrote:Thus spake Dulgin:
> Hi Joel,
>
> thank you for the info.
>
>
> Yesterday I have tired to upload 2 module-files. I've got the error that
> the mime-type of the files isn't valied.
> Please check it.

Try now. You should find this is fixed.

--
J.

Have I.
On my first try I got the same error message.

On the second try I have renamed the files and replaced the points (.) with underscore (_).
The only point left was the divider between name and extension.
Then it worked.

Re: Has the look of the Modules section changed?

PostPosted: August 1st, 2016, 1:16 pm
by uckelman
Thus spake Dulgin:
> Have I.
> On my first try I got the same error message.
>
> On the second try I have renamed the files and replaced the points (.)
> with underscore (_).
> The only point left was the divider between name and extension.
> Then it worked.

What files did you upload?

--
J.

Re: Has the look of the Modules section changed?

PostPosted: August 1st, 2016, 2:50 pm
by Dulgin
uckelman wrote:Thus spake Dulgin:
> Have I.
> On my first try I got the same error message.
>
> On the second try I have renamed the files and replaced the points (.)
> with underscore (_).
> The only point left was the divider between name and extension.
> Then it worked.

What files did you upload?

--
J.


Arkwright_v1.0.1.vmod + Arkwright_v1.0.1DE.vmod didn't work.
Arkwright_v1_0_1.vmod + Arkwright_v1_0_1DE.vmod work and are released (same file, reneamed).

Re: Has the look of the Modules section changed?

PostPosted: August 1st, 2016, 8:40 pm
by uckelman
I know what the immediate cause of the wiki formatting problem is now: MediaWiki is not serving out the CSS for our theme.

Re: Has the look of the Modules section changed?

PostPosted: August 1st, 2016, 10:20 pm
by uckelman
I believe I've fixed the theme problem now. Please check over the wiki for anything which looks different from how it had looked.

Re: Has the look of the Modules section changed?

PostPosted: August 2nd, 2016, 5:29 am
by RobS
uckelman wrote:I believe I've fixed the theme problem now. Please check over the wiki for anything which looks different from how it had looked.

The Module section looks to be back to normal.
The Wiki section is something I've rarely looked at and never dealt with.

Re: Has the look of the Modules section changed?

PostPosted: August 2nd, 2016, 7:58 am
by Dulgin
The module section looks as it should and the wiki, too.

Thanks for your effort.