Trade resolution as I understand it is
Creuss 2 for Yin 1 with Yin returning a TG, Creuss 2 for Hacan 3, with Microtech Creuss gain 7
Yin 1 for Creuss 2 returning 1, Yin 1 for Saar 1. Yin gains 2
Saar 1 for Yin 1, Saar 2 for Hacan 3, Saar gains 3
Hacan 3 for Creuss 2, Hacan 3 for Saar 3, with racial and Micro Hacan gains 8. Hacan passes agreed upon 5 tg reparations?
Xxcha no trades.
Naalu no trades.
Naalu proposes 2 for Xxcha 2 I think from JP’s post. This trade will be allowed only if both parties pass 1 tg each.
I have also just had my comp cleaned and for some reason I cannot open the file I have downloaded. I will try to remedy the situation but I wonder if JP could pm me my Merc choices just to speed it along.
While it is entirely possible that the Creuss are being naive, we believe that we have negotiated an agreement with the Hacan. We did not freeze the bulk of his fighting fleet with the Diplomacy SC or a possible AC. In return we asked for no aggression towards our HS this turn. We will be able to see if this holds true when the next Assembly is played. If it appears that the Hacan have played us false then we will hurl our meager fleet at them in desperation. As in any game I must trust a player at their word until such a time that they prove to be untrustworthy. In my group a false agreement hangs like an ANVIL around the players neck for many many games, while my limited online experience shows that this is not always the case we must give the benefit of the doubt.
Creuss
The rule says the shots must first be evenly distributed before assigning a second hit. In fact, the example listed has 2 cruisers and 1 merc taking 4 shots with two evasion attempts. (See page 12 of Shards of the throne.)
can you specify this? Is this two hits to the dn or two to fighters?
When I took Saar’s casualities, I distributed all shots evenly then did a second to the merc.
I did forget about Naalu’s fighter bonus. So the merc should have a third evasion attempt. (3-failed)